Intelligent Life On Planet Rock

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

A Grump has a Moan

Gatz's picture

I'm sure that I'm not the only one who is finding this Friday more difficult than usual to endure because they are surrounded by colleagues determined to use the excuse of disadvantaged children to demonstrate how 'wacky' they are.
Some words of advice:

• I’ll make my charity donations anonymously and without the provocation of mass self-humiliation, if that’s alright with you.
• If you’re not funny for the other 364 days of the year then wearing a pink wig and dressing like Timmy Mallett is unlikely to render you so on the other day.
• I presume the idea of 'dress-down' days is that wearing a suit and tie is something you resent the rest of the time. I don't; I like my tie thanks, and while I'm on the subject I can't help but notice that the people who dress worst in 'office' clothes also dress worst in civvies.
• I have a horrible feeling that the singing is going to start soon. When you get to my desk and I say that I will give you some money if it makes you go away I mean it. Please do not make the mistake of assuming that I am joking for my wrath shall be terrible. I shall retrieve my money, and that will make the little kiddiwinks cry, and then you’ll be sorry.

9

Thankfully we're all of the same opinion in our office

and we simply ignore the whole thing.

For some people, it's the most fun they have all year.

1
Five-Centres | 20 November 2009 - 11:16am

I'm dressing as Eve Mendes for the day.

I work from home, so nobody will see me, but even so.

I'm dressing as Eva Mendes for the day.

5
Albert Edward | 20 November 2009 - 11:18am

Cheer Up!

I'm all for the odd wacky day in the office, breaks up the monotony. And the donations go to a pretty good cause.

1
Johnny The Fox | 20 November 2009 - 11:20am

Gatz, I'm with you.

Thankfully I'm at home today - so dressed as Arthur Dent.

The grief I got one Comic Relief for not turning up at work with 'bad hair' - it just depressed me all day. You are right - just 'cos Wogan or Henry or Fearne Flipping Cotton encourages you it doesn't make it right. And if you patiently explain that you give money to charity all year round (I do, not much, but I give what I can afford) you just get a roll of the eyes.

I'm not feeling funny or wacky or zany today - I can't turn it on and off at will - leave me alone. Might be my T-shirt slogan of choice.

3
Adman | 20 November 2009 - 11:52am

Not working

As someone now glad to be out of a job and the office, one thing on top of my list of "what I don't miss" is this enforced jollity and wackiness that comes around this day. If you don't get something shaved or at least give a pound then you're the anti Christ.
What sickens me even more is the recent exposure of the expenses the BBC claim for this day: flowers and thank you cards to the "stars". Those people just must be laughing at us as we give up our money.
Does anyone know how much goes on expenses whenever they do one of these?
In this time of senseless conflict they'll probably also show footage of some army fundraising in Helmad province. Just think of what we could do for the children there if.....ah but it's too late for poor malformed babies of Faluja

1
handslikeladies | 20 November 2009 - 11:53am

I rather resent the idea

that I should give my spare cash to Pudsey simply because the BBC, Sir Tel and a host of others slebs tell me to. Or that not doing so makes me some kind of scrooge. As per Gatz above, I prefer to make my donations anonymously but also to charities I choose, for reasons I choose, by monthly standing order and with the tax relief box ticked.

It's a good cause, it's fun etc: yes, I fully agree. But charity isn't a once a year, salve your conscience with donation to a charity selected by someone else jobbie.

1
Mark JF | 20 November 2009 - 12:31pm

I used to work for the BBC.

Children in Need invariably had me phoning in sick. God I hate it. Is it CIN or comic relief which has news readers making plonkers of themselves? I hate them both.

One good thing though, is the pub beckons...

0
ganglesprocket | 20 November 2009 - 12:40pm

Everyone who works at the BBC...

loathes Children In Need.

0
Kit Hogue | 20 November 2009 - 4:07pm

Saint Tel

I am still surprised that Terry Wogan was not given a lot more stick over the revelation that he alone among the celebs charged (does he still ?) an appearance fee.

And don't get me started on the cast of that vile prog 'stenders showing what jolly multi-talented entertainers they are actually by cracking a smile and a caterwaul for charidee.

1
cornishmanc | 20 November 2009 - 12:42pm

Ah, Wogan

I think Wogan is a marvellous broadcaster, but the revelation that he was pocketing £10,000 to front CIN was hilarious. On his radio show, he bangs on about Children in Need constantly, and he continually thanks people for giving 10 or 20 quid - when he earned not far off half the average yearly wage for one night's emotive guilt-tripping!

2
peterthecook | 20 November 2009 - 1:10pm

The auction for things that money can't buy.

That money can buy.

Genius. I have to avoid the whole week on the radio 'cos of that.

Oh, yes and Mr. and Mrs. Considerablyricherthanyou of Solihull have just bid £50,000 to have their inner thighs rubbed by Nigella Lawson and Gordon Ramsay in a hot air ballon tethered above Sarah Kennedy's country residence. Marvellous. Now here's Waterloo by Abba....

2
Adman | 20 November 2009 - 1:20pm

"inner thighs rubbed by Nigella Lawson"

stop! Some of us are trying to get some work done!

0
DougieJ | 20 November 2009 - 4:00pm

Pay 50p...

and you could get her Dad to do it.

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 November 2009 - 6:12pm

Mmmmmm...

Nigel.
*sigh*

0
Adman | 20 November 2009 - 6:30pm

Any chance...

...of any of the slebs sending their fees to the benighted sodden residents of Cumbria at all? No??

1
Richie B | 20 November 2009 - 1:27pm

I have managed to avoid Comic Relief since it began...

and I'm not about to give in now. I've got a standing order with Unicef instead.

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 November 2009 - 1:31pm

Yes,

but what about Children in Need?

0
Mikhail | 20 November 2009 - 11:57pm

B...

lasted double posts.

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 November 2009 - 1:31pm

Is it hopeless nowadays to ask...

...if everyone's so wholehearedly behind it, and everyone should contribute, and the causes are undeniably deserving, why not, instead of today's ghastly spectacle, pay for these things through taxes, like we used to do?

0
Lucky Tiler | 20 November 2009 - 2:16pm

There is the argument

That it raises a great deal of money that would otherwise go unraised and that goes to a worthy cause*. It's all very well people saying that they give to charity in other ways and in a way suited to them. Great. I'm really pleased you do. But most people who give a few quid when prompted by Children in Need or Comic Relief probably don't give anything like as much the rest of the year.

And if some people have fun in raising money I don't see the harm. Yes you wouldn't want to do it, I wouldn't want to do it. And we can say, slightly condescendingly, that it's the most fun those people have all year but if it raises money that would otherwise not go to any charity, I can put up with people making annoying arses of themselves.

Having said all that, I do get irritated by Wogan's all year round mention of the event and by the fact that he gets paid for doing it. And I hate the bloody awful auction of things that money can't buy which only makes me realise that there are some people with more money than they know what to do with and that I really should look up that membership form for Class War.

* I heard a trail this morning of kids who've been helped to cope with bullyind through Kidscape which is one of the charities helped by CIN. If paying someone in a fright wig prompts me to hand over a fiver to stop even one child being driven to suicide by bullying then I think that's a small price to pay.

2
Tim McGuire | 20 November 2009 - 2:20pm

Hours lost

If it's what people want to do then it's fine. Fortunately being at a quite large company it's quite easy to avoid this type of thing. What I find most annoying for some unfathomable reason is that the people taking part somehow seem to think that everyone else knows all about what's going on etc I don't think I'd really been aware it was even going on until yesterday. It's a very BBC-centric thing and even as a 6Music listener it had passed me by (I don't think they get involved).
What struck me today when I passed a couple of things going on is how many working hours must be lost because of it. If I was the employer I think I'd rather tot up the hours expected to be lost and pay that sum to a charity and hope that everyone gets on with their work as usual.

0
JohnW | 20 November 2009 - 3:10pm

I'm an employer and I do this.

Except that I invoice the people responsible for the lost man hours. A list of my debtors includes the BBC, the FA, The Royal Family, Pret A Manger, Armitage Shanks, Benson & Hedges, PG Tips, Michael Jackson, the X Factor, HBO and the Internet.

0
Albert Edward | 20 November 2009 - 4:01pm

When it was just one night

it was 'almost' bearable. (No pun intended)

In yesteryear, you knew you could go out for one evening a year and miss the enforced jollity.

Now, it's everywhere for so long beforehand. The auctions, the televised concerts, the bizarre celeb-infested TV programmes, the constant plugs on radio.

Fortunately, I've got Series 2 of True Blood on illegal download to watch ;o)

0
robram | 20 November 2009 - 3:48pm

It's not everywhere

It's always interesting when someone says "it's everywhere" and I've missed out on it altogether. Surely CIN is only exposed to a very narrow (albeit large) audience. I've just looked digiguide and it only seems to be on BBC1 (I don't usually bother checking on BBC1 on a Friday night - it's a bit of a nogo area generally which is why I didn't see it I suppose). I see there was something else on yesterday which I saw in the listing but I looked at the description and didn't set the recorder - I didn't realise that it was a charity event. I listen to BBC Radio a lot and I didn't hear anything of it there either so I assume that not all BBC radio joins in. I reckon I listen to an average of about 2.5 hours of BBC music radio a day and watch about 2 hours of television a day (not all BBC - it's from PVRs so I don't care what channel it was on) and I honestly didn't know that today was CIN day until we got an email yesterday at work about an "event" going on today. I hardly ever see any trailers because I watch just about everything on PVRs and skip the trailers, I wonder how often I miss things that I would actually want to watch.

1
JohnW | 20 November 2009 - 4:30pm

I'm not generally given to spouting scripture

But I think Jesus had it just about right:

Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.

Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.

In other words, do it quietly, don't twat around in a bear suit, and don't use it as an opportunity to revive your wortless d-list celebrity career.

Here endeth the lesson.

1
Kit Hogue | 20 November 2009 - 4:12pm

"Don't twat around in a bear suit"

If Jesus said stuff like that more often, I'd read his books.

2
Captain Underpants | 20 November 2009 - 4:21pm

as a large hairy man

:-)

0
Danmac | 20 November 2009 - 6:00pm

I'm not donating

to CIN as they'll probably just stuff the cash into an Iclandic bank. Also, I find Wogan's 20 grand appearance fee and Keilty's five grand suit allowance somewhat distasteful. That's more than I earn in a year combined.

0
Futurenoir | 20 November 2009 - 7:27pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd